www.casemine.com
- Domain
- www.casemine.com
- Category
- Uncategorized
- Publisher
- casemine.com
Top References from www.casemine.com
| Score | Article | Date | Citations |
|---|---|---|---|
| 6.5 |
Jia Lal Abrol v. Sarla Devi ., Jammu and Kashmir High Court, Judgment, Law, casemine.comhttps://www.casemine.com/judgement/in/56b495de607dba348f0158e1 |
N/A | 2 |
| 6.5 |
Prakash Chand v. State Of Himachal Pradesh And Others, Himachal Pradesh High Court, Judgment, Law, casemine.comhttps://www.casemine.com/judgement/in/56092c12e4b01497111f8df9 |
N/A | 2 |
| 6.5 |
R.K Mahajan v. Chief Justice Of H.P High Court And Others, Supreme Court Of India, Judgment, Law, casemine.comhttps://www.casemine.com/judgement/in/575fd23e607dba63d7e67116 |
N/A | 2 |
| 6.5 |
Calcutta Chemical Co. Ltd. v. Dhiresh Chandra Roy., Calcutta High Court, Judgment, Law, casemine.comhttps://www.casemine.com/judgement/in/56095f76e4b01497112ca4fb |
N/A | 2 |
| 6.5 |
Union Of India v. J & K Cigarettes Ltd., Jammu and Kashmir High Court, Judgment, Law, casemine.comhttps://www.casemine.com/judgement/in/56092c5ee4b01497111f97b0 |
N/A | 2 |
| 3.2 |
UNITED STATES of America v. Samuel Rizzo DE CAVALCANTE, Appellant in No. 19310, Gaetano Dominick Vastola and Daniel Annunziata. Appeal of Gaetano Dominick VASTOLA, in No. 19,311. Appeal of Daniel ANNUNZIATA, in No. 19,312.https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/59149842add7b049346015a3 |
N/A | 1 |
| 3.2 |
Vuxuto Achumi v. Union Of India, Gauhati High Court, Judgment, Law, casemine.comhttps://www.casemine.com/judgement/in/56eaaad4607dba3c8ce3f83b |
N/A | 1 |
| 3.2 |
Ashim Kr.Baruah v. Tanushyam Borgohain, Gauhati High Court, Judgment, Law, casemine.comhttps://www.casemine.com/judgement/in/56eaac4c607dba3c8ce414e9 |
N/A | 1 |
| 3.2 |
Enhanced Requirements for Vaughn Indexes in FOIA Proceedings: Davin v. United States Department of Justice, FBIhttps://www.casemine.com/commentary/us/enhanced-requirements-for-vaughn-indexes-in-foia-proceedings:-davin-v.-united-states-department-of-justice,-fbi/view |
N/A | 1 |
| 3.2 |
Supreme Court Upholds Partial Ban on Cow Slaughter in Mohd. Hanif Quareshi v. State Of Biharhttps://www.casemine.com/commentary/in/supreme-court-upholds-partial-ban-on-cow-slaughter-in-mohd.-hanif-quareshi-v.-state-of-bihar/view |
N/A | 1 |
| 3.2 |
VINCENT DIMODICA, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/5914b3e2add7b04934768f80 |
N/A | 1 |
| 3.2 |
R v D (R v Dunlop) [2006] EWCA Crim 1354 (summary)https://www.casemine.com/judgement/uk/5a8ff6fd60d03e7f57ea55c1 |
N/A | 1 |
| 3.2 |
Freedom of the Press Affirmed: The Supreme Court's Ruling in Sakal Papers (P) Ltd. v. Union of Indiahttps://www.casemine.com/commentary/in/freedom-of-the-press-affirmed:-the-supreme-court's-ruling-in-sakal-papers-(p)-ltd.-v.-union-of-india/view |
N/A | 1 |
| 3.2 |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. ANTHONY URSO, et. al., Defendants.https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/5914b594add7b049347738a3 |
N/A | 1 |
| 3.2 |
People v. Searles-Harrishttps://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/599eeb44add7b03d1713915b |
N/A | 1 |
| 3.2 |
United States of America v. Louis Marino.https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/5914be71add7b049347a8352 |
N/A | 1 |
| 3.2 |
GRANCIO v. VECCHIOhttps://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/5914b29fadd7b049347610e4 |
N/A | 1 |
| 3.2 |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE, v. VICTOR J. ORENA, ALSO KNOWN AS LITTLE VIC, DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/5914bdd7add7b049347a4c68 |
N/A | 1 |
| 3.2 |
Indian Motion Picture Producers' Association v. Federation Of Western India Cine Employees, Competition Commission Of India, Judgment, Law, casemine.comhttps://www.casemine.com/judgement/in/5ad81d784a93263d6da15bca |
N/A | 1 |
| 3.2 |
[No title]https://www.casemine.com/judgement/in/56093b15e4b014971122894f |
N/A | 1 |
| 3.2 |
UNITED STATES of America v. Francis IANNARELLA, Jr.https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/5914bc22add7b0493479aa5a |
N/A | 1 |
| 3.2 |
John A. MANDACINA, Petitioner, v. Stehttps://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/627cf594714d585d57c912ce |
N/A | 1 |
| 3.2 |
VINCENT DEMARTINO, Petitioner, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent.https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/5914b044add7b04934751f74 |
N/A | 1 |
| 3.2 |
The Hockey Maharashtra And Others Petitioners v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others S, Bombay High Court, Judgmenthttps://www.casemine.com/judgement/in/58117ec52713e179478b888f |
N/A | 1 |
| 3.2 |
Subhash Ch. Sethy And Others v. State Of Orissa And Others, Orissa High Court, Judgment, Law, casemine.comhttps://www.casemine.com/judgement/in/560988b9e4b014971137e9d8 |
N/A | 1 |
| 3.2 |
Anonymous v. Mollonhttps://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/59149485add7b049345be3bf |
N/A | 1 |
| 3.2 |
FEWIN v. CITY OF POPLAR BLUFFhttps://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/59148ab1add7b0493451631d |
N/A | 1 |
| 3.2 |
U.S. v. SIMONEhttps://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/591477a4add7b049343d753f |
N/A | 1 |
| 3.2 |
The Karnataka Planters' Association, Spencer Road, Chikmagalur & Ors. v. State of Karnatakahttps://www.casemine.com/judgement/in/56093f7ee4b0149711235ae3 |
N/A | 1 |
| 3.2 |
James Carnegie v Charles Carnegie., Scottish Court of Session, Judgment, Law, casemine.comhttps://www.casemine.com/judgement/uk/5a8ff7f460d03e7f57eb384c |
N/A | 1 |
| 3.2 |
Federal Habeas Corpus Jurisdiction Excluded in State Child Custody Terminations: LEHMAN v. LYCOMING COUNTY CHILDREN'S SERVICES Agencyhttps://www.casemine.com/commentary/us/federal-habeas-corpus-jurisdiction-excluded-in-state-child-custody-terminations:-lehman-v.-lycoming-county-children's-services-agency/view |
N/A | 1 |
| 3.2 |
H. H. Maharajadhiraj... v. H. H. Maharajadhiraj..., Supreme Court Of India, Judgment, Law, casemine.comhttps://www.casemine.com/judgement/in/5609ab6ae4b014971140c682 |
N/A | 1 |
| 3.2 |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. MICHAEL SESSA, Defendant. MICHAEL SESSA, Petitioner,https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/5914af91add7b0493474db2c |
N/A | 1 |
| 3.2 |
BLACK ET AL. v. BOARD OF SUPERVISORS OF ELECTIONS OF BALTIMORE CITYhttps://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/5914c8f2add7b049347ee4a8 |
N/A | 1 |
| 3.2 |
CAR DEKHO .COM, (GIRNAR SOFTWARE PVT LTD v. ANIL KUMAR DATTA, State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission, Judgment, Lawhttps://www.casemine.com/judgement/in/685d7aecb72660419d04fd5f |
N/A | 1 |
| 3.2 |
People versus Grajedahttps://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/5914fb2cadd7b049349ac0c9 |
N/A | 1 |
| 3.2 |
Defining 'State' Authority and Ensuring Equal Treatment: Insights from Rajasthan State Electricity Board v. Mohan Lalhttps://www.casemine.com/commentary/in/defining-'state'-authority-and-ensuring-equal-treatment:-insights-from-rajasthan-state-electricity-board-v.-mohan-lal/view |
N/A | 1 |
| 3.2 |
Westside wilmas: US Case Lawhttps://www.casemine.com/search/us/Westside+wilmas |
N/A | 1 |
| 3.2 |
Inquiry under the Fatal Accidents and Inquiries (Scotland) Act 1976 into the sudden death of Kieran Nicholhttps://www.casemine.com/judgement/uk/5a8ff7eb60d03e7f57eb2dd3 |
N/A | 1 |
| 3.2 |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, APPELLEE, v. LARRY SESSA, DEFENDANT, GREGORY SCARPA, JR., DEFENDANT-APPELLANT.https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/5914818dadd7b04934486ac1 |
N/A | 1 |
| 3.2 |
Durga Shibaprasad Roy Another v. Union Of India Others, Calcutta High Court, Judgment, Law, casemine.comhttps://www.casemine.com/judgement/in/56ea8314607dba36fd0b7a1e |
N/A | 1 |
| 3.2 |
INSURANCE COMPANY OF NORTH AMERICA, Respondent-Appellant, v. CITY OF NEW YORK, Appellant-Respondent, and BERNARD B. COHEN, as Receihttps://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/5914c14aadd7b049347b8adb |
N/A | 1 |
| 3.2 |
P. Raghupathi Naicker v. The Commissioner And Secretary To The Government Of Tamil Nadu And Ors., Madras High Court, Judgment, Law, casemine.comhttps://www.casemine.com/judgement/in/5609001ce4b0149711153725 |
N/A | 1 |
| 3.2 |
BELL v. STATE, No. 37258.https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/5914caecadd7b049347fe7bf |
N/A | 1 |
| 3.2 |
Charan Lal Sahu v. Union Of India: Affirming State's Role as Parens Patriae in Industrial Disaster Claimshttps://www.casemine.com/commentary/in/charan-lal-sahu-v.-union-of-india:-affirming-state's-role-as-parens-patriae-in-industrial-disaster-claims/view |
N/A | 1 |
| 3.2 |
Shapiro v. Winston-Salem, N.C., Judgment, Law, casemine.comhttps://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/5914a41eadd7b049346b3e6d |
N/A | 1 |
| 3.2 |
Regulatory Oversight and Commissioned Agency Models: When Discrimination Tribunal Jurisdiction Ends Because the Claimant Is Not an “Employee”https://www.casemine.com/commentary/uk/regulatory-oversight-and-commissioned-agency-models:-when-discrimination-tribunal-jurisdiction-ends-because-the-claimant-is-not-an-employee/view |
N/A | 1 |
| 3.2 |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, v. ERNEST MONTEVECCHI, Defendant.https://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/5ee854414653d035d524ecf2 |
N/A | 1 |
| 3.2 |
Hamburg v. Statehttps://www.casemine.com/judgement/us/5914a154add7b0493468752c |
N/A | 1 |
| 3.2 |
Bushel's Casehttps://www.casemine.com/judgement/uk/5b2897d02c94e06b9e19bae1 |
N/A | 1 |